About Veritas Prep

GMAT Prep & Admissions Blog As the world's largest privately-owned GMAT Prep and admissions consulting provider, Veritas Prep maintains a large network of instructors, consultants, and students. Our blog is a way of opening up this community to new visitors and sharing our knowledge about standardized testing, graduate school admissions, and the business world itself.
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2009

Veritas Prep to Participate in Microsoft MBA Admissions Panel

This Thursday, Scott Shrum, Veritas Prep's Director of MBA Admissions Research, will appear in a panel discussion at Microsoft, as part of the Africans at Microsoft Club's second annual Business School Panel: "Standing Out Among the Outstanding: Recession, Competition, and Business School Admissions."

In addition to Scott, the panel will include:

  • Cassandra Pittman Assistant Director of Marketing at INSEAD and responsible for MBA recruitment in North and South America

  • Barbara Thomas, President and CEO National Black MBA Association, the world's leading organization for black professionals


There will also be "experts in the audience" contributing to the dialogue: Bryan Tomlinson and Edward Gali, both representing the University of Washington's Michael G. Foster School of Business.

Our friends at MBA Podcaster will attend the event, and will and bring your questions to the panelists. If you have any questions that you would like to hear answered, send them to info@mbapodcaster.com.

For everyone in Redmond, we hope to see you at the event!

Read More >>
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Business Games

One of my favorite hobbies is to play video games. There’s just something about them. And I’m not alone either… the video game industry is a hot market. And it got me thinking the other day about how the big three companies (Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo) went about conducting business in this current “generation” of video game consoles (the X-Box 360, PlayStation 3, and Wii, respectively). What can we learn about business decisions by looking at the ones made by these three companies? Read on to find out!

When designing their new systems, Microsoft and Sony both decided to create enhanced versions of their previous systems, capable of outputting in HD, utilizing new video technology, building extensive online communities, and so on. Nintendo, on the other hand, chose to innovate, rather than expand. The introduced an entirely new way of playing (with a motion-sensitive controller), and opened the door to completely new kinds of games.

What were the ramifications of Nintendo’s decision to build something completely different, rather than try fighting with Microsoft and Sony in terms of power? It was truly a gamble, because they would need to come up with something incredible if they weren’t going to fight in terms of power. The question is, how did they do?

The answer is pretty simple: Nintendo is destroying the competition. In this era of bigger games, fancier graphics, robust online communities, etc., the most successful company (in terms of units sold) is the one that refused to play that game.

It seems counter-intuitive. After all, isn’t one of the cardinal rules of business and marketing to know your audience? Doesn’t the “typical” gamer want a more powerful system, one that can run nicer graphics, larger worlds, and all those new features boasted by the Microsoft and Sony consoles? Absolutely. But that’s not who Nintendo is marketing to.

Nintendo is marketing to everybody else. The “non-gamers”. They’re targeting entire families. While Microsoft and Sony duke it out to win over members of the established niche group, Nintendo is just bringing in everybody else. My mother, who I could never get to play my X-Box for more than 5 minutes, bought a Wii. And she continues to buy games for it. My whole family plays on occasion. Even my 4 year-old cousin plays when she comes to visit.

So what’s my point? What’s the lesson I think you should take away from this? I guess I’m just trying to say that when it comes to building up your business, you don’t always need to play by the established rules to win. Sometimes, thinking outside the box (as cliché as that may be) is the way to go. You need to be smart about it, of course, but don’t be afraid to be bold.

Know of any other examples of this kind of effect? Drop us a link in the comments!

[- Read the rest here -]

Read More >>
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

More on Microsoft & Google

I was talking the other day about Office Live and Google Apps, and managed to find this little article actually comparing the two. If you're considering using one of those, I'd suggest checking it out.

Comparing Office Live and Google Apps

Read More >>
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 1, 2006

Microsoft v. Google

In a couple of weeks, Microsoft will be releasing Office Live, which is their collection of online business services. It has been in beta testing since February, and it should be interesting to see how Microsoft's business services compare with the ones Google released a couple months ago.

One notable thing about the Microsoft one is that there is a "basic" package for small businesses which is free, and comes with some handy features for a budding business (domain name, email accounts, etc.) On the other hand, Google's basic services are free to everybody (though Google doesn't offer domain names).

Should be interesting to see how they stack up. And hopefully the competition will drive both of these companies to continue offering such useful software to the business world.

Read More >>
Bookmark and Share
 
Featured in Alltop Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Academics blogs alternative Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory