Put the Critic in Critical Reasoning
(This is one of a series of GMAT tips that we offer on our blog.)
Perhaps it's just the age in which we live, but people nowadays are much better at criticism than praise, and at skepticism than optimism. Perhaps it's just our love for Jon Lovitz' role as "The Critic", or our drive to consistently identify where we can improve, but we tend to do a better job of analysis when we seek out flaws in something than when we see it as sufficient as it is.
You can use this tendency to your advantage when approaching Critical Reasoning questions, as certain question stems give you the opportunity to choose your role -- critic of the argument, or defender of the argument. These questions may ask:
"Which of the following studies would be most useful in assessing the validity of the argument?"
"Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?"
In either of these cases, if you can try to anticipate bad news -- either the study would reveal damaging information, or the assumption turns out to be invalid -- you will awaken your inner skeptic and tend to be more efficient of the flaws contained within the argument. In short, when a question gives you an option of how to approach an existing argument -- you could either take the role as a defender/owner of the argument, or of a skeptic -- you'll likely find it easier to be critical of the argument, as that's just human nature these days.
For more help on the GMAT, take a look at the free GMAT practice resources that Veritas Prep offers.
About Veritas Prep
| As the world's largest privately-owned GMAT Prep and admissions consulting provider, Veritas Prep maintains a large network of instructors, consultants, and students. Our blog is a way of opening up this community to new visitors and sharing our knowledge about standardized testing, graduate school admissions, and the business world itself. |
Friday, February 27, 2009
GMAT Tip of the Week
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Announcing Veritas Prep's Graduate School Admissions Consulting Services
We are pleased to announce the latest offering to Veritas Prep's many admissions consulting options: graduate school admissions consulting.
Every week we receive dozens of calls to our headquarters from potential clients seeking help with a variety of graduate school applications. From masters programs in accounting and computer science to graduate degrees in the arts to PhD programs in economics, there are a multitude of subject areas requiring application perfection in order to gain access to the program of your dreams. We identified that there was a significant need for a service that would help as many people as possible by zeroing in on the common factors inherent in all of those application types.
The thread that connects nearly every graduate school admissions process is the importance of the critical writing samples that populate the applications. Therefore, the Veritas Prep graduate school admissions consulting services focus on those key documents that will create the backbone of your application: the essays, the personal statement, and the resume.
The hallmarks of Veritas Prep are expertise and level of care. Each of these attributes are on full display here as clients are paired with an expert consultant who possesses at least two graduate degrees and is a published writer.
If you're interested in general law school admissions or business school admissions consulting, visit our web site to learn more!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Veritas Prep on the Cover of Entrepreneur Magazine
Veritas Prep has hit your local newsstand! This month's issue of Entrepreneur Magazine features a cover story about Veritas Prep and its two co-founders, Markus Moberg and Chad Troutwine. The story describes how Veritas Prep evolved from an idea for how to build a better test prep company to a winning business plan entry to a startup run out of their dining room to the fastest-growing GMAT prep and admissions consulting company in the world.
We've enjoyed seeing the company get so much publicity for its success, and it was really flattering when the article compared Veritas Prep to other companies that have taken on industry leaders and won, such as Apple, Netflix, and Google. We are also glad that the article emphasizes how obsessed we are with keeping our curriculum on the leading edge and maintaining a team of instructors of the highest quality. This is exactly how we have become so successful, and will always be the case, no matter how large Veritas Prep grows.
Most importantly, the story validates all of the hard work that the entire team has done, starting with Chad and Markus back in 2002, to the first employee they hired to help answer phones, to the whole team that we have today. We have a really dedicated hard-working team, from everyone at Veritas Prep HQ to every GMAT instructor and admissions consultant who works every day to help someone get into the grad school of their choice. This article is a celebration of everyone's hard work and success!
Click here to read the Entrepreneur article. If you're new to Veritas Prep and want to learn more about how we can help you, take a look at the GMAT prep and admissions consulting services that we offer.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Announcing The Laid-Off Professional's Guide to MBA Admissions
In response to the ever-worsening economy, we have just released a guide to help recently laid-off business school applicants overcome their career setbacks and gain admissions to the world's most competitive MBA programsThe Laid-Off Professional's Guide to MBA Admissions gives you specific, step-by-step instructions for how you can overcome the setback of a job loss and still shine in MBA admissions eyes.
The key themes that you will want to emphasize in your application include:
- Now is the right time. You should explain that the decision to apply is the result of a well-conceived plan, not the knee-reaction of someone who fears a period of unemployment underemployment. If admissions officers sense that you're in the latter camp, they will likely pass over your application and move on to candidates with more compelling reasons for wanting to earn an MBA.
- You are a star, not a victim. Essays, letters of recommendation and admission interviews will allow you to highlight multiple professional success stories. Pointing to career achievements paints the picture of a perennial winner who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when jobs had to be cut.
- You made lemonade out of lemons. Did you use your new-found free time to volunteer or take a night class to hone skill areas? While reporting on these accomplishments may seem less attractive than boasting about a position on the corporate ladder, admissions officers appreciate it when applicants demonstrate productivity during any extended period of time off between jobs.
This white paper is the first installment of The Veritas Prep Recovery Series, a collection of white papers devoted to helping business school applicants who need to overcome certain weaknesses or blemished in their backgrounds.
The The Laid-Off Professional's Guide to MBA Admissions is available for free download here. If you have recently lost your job, or are afraid you will, don't worry... We're here to help! Read More >>
Monday, February 23, 2009
GMAT & MBA Admissions Seminars Tonight in Boston, DC, and NYC
Attention all GMAT test takers in New York, Boston, and Washington, D.C.! This is a reminder that Veritas Prep will host a free seminar in your city tonight.
Additionally, for the people in New York and DC, we have special giveaways planned. One New York seminar attendee will win a free Veritas Prep GMAT course, a $1,500 value. When you arrive, make sure to sign in to be eligible to win the free course. You will also get to hear from Veritas Prep co-founder Chad Troutwine on his proven tactics for acing the GMAT.
All Washington, D.C., seminar attendees will receive a free copy of Your MBA Game Plan, the leading book on MBA admissions and the foundation of the Veritas Prep MBA admissions consulting approach. All you need to do is attend and sign in to receive your free copy of the book.
Boston seminar attendees, we haven't forgotten about you. While we're not doing a giveaway in Boston tonight, you will still get two hours of great GMAT and MBA admissions info from one of our top instructors.
If you miss any of these, you can still attend our next free online GMAT and MBA admissions seminar, which runs on March 4th at 8:00 PM EST.
Friday, February 20, 2009
GMAT Tip of the Week
A Logical Approach To Sentence Correction
(This is one of a series of GMAT tips that we offer on our blog.)
There is probably no more illogical discipline in academia than English grammar, in which seemingly the only rule is that there are generally several exceptions to each rule. Alas, as English has become a primary language of the business world, the GMAT requires examinees to be proficient in a number of grammatical devices through the Sentence Correction style of question, which comprises 1/3 of the Verbal section of the exam. Fear not (or, maybe fear slightly), however, as the GMAT focuses on a limited scope of the English language, and the Veritas Prep verbal syllabus teaches those particular skills thoroughly.
Because of the seemingly-illogical nature of the English language, it would seem illogical that some of the more-difficult GMAT Sentence Correction questions can be answered using logic. Say, for example, that you narrowed your answer choices down to the following:
B) Gary mistook the car, which was backfiring, for a gunshot.
D) Gary mistook the sound of a backfiring car for a gunshot.
While neither may appear to have a distinct grammatical error, answer choice B is simply illogical - a gunshot is a sound (or event) while a car is an object, and therefore one could not logically mistake the car for the gunshot. D, which correctly equates the sound of the car with the sound of the gunshot, is an accurate sentence, and is thus correct.
How can you use this to your advantage? Consider this -- it doesn't behoove business schools to admit students based upon their knowledge of obscure and complicated English language idioms, but it does make sense for schools to admit students who can think logically. While certain elements of grammar are distinctly testable, and you need to understand them thoroughly, if you don't see an opportunity to employ one of the major error types, your time may be better spent by considering the logic of the remaining options than by worrying over tiny constructions of idiomatic grammar.
For more GMAT prep tips and resources, visit Veritas Prep.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Pros and Cons of a JD/MBA
Part 1: Finances
Over the next several weeks, Veritas Prep will be running an occasional series on the increasingly popular JD/MBA. We added the JD/MBA Admissions Consulting service last fall in response to the lack of information that currently exists about this versatile grad school option and will be running this series to help people decide whether this is the right degree program for them.
We will start by examining the financial considerations associated with the degree, as the analysis is pretty straight forward and of obvious importance to prospective students.
JD vs. MBA students. From a financial standpoint, a JD/MBA often makes more sense for a law student seeking to add the MBA than vice versa. This is true for a simple reason: law school is a longer program. Since most JD/MBA programs are four years in length (the most notable exceptions are Northwestern, Duke, and Penn - all offer three-year programs), it is only one extra year for a law student, yet it is double the length for an MBA student.
Pros. For an MBA student, the financial advantages to a JD/MBA are sometimes hard to identify but it usually comes down to versatility. A JD/MBA may not increase immediate earning power, but it will provide some security in a recession economy. Lawyers are seeing bonuses minimized and salaries frozen, but for the most part they are keeping their jobs. "Legal" is often the last budget item to get cut. Therefore, it can be quite comforting to have a JD in a time when Wall Street banks are transforming into nationalized institutions, right down to the government jobs. Furthermore, a JD/MBA offers more flexibility with regard to emerging industries. An example of this would be the increased role that financial regulation will have in the American work force in the coming years. There is perhaps no greater educational path to working in regulation or corporate governance than a JD/MBA.
On the law school side, the benefits are more immediate and more tangible. Most top law firms (notable exceptions include: Cravath, Paul Weiss, and Latham Watkins) pay a JD/MBA bonus that is equitable to a low-level federal clerkship bonus ($15K-$30K), and many will start an incoming associate with a JD/MBA at a second-year salary. (Note: very few firms will consider you as a second year associate for partner track simply for having a JD/MBA, which distinguishes it from a clerkship "bump".)
Cons. The financial downside to a JD/MBA is fairly obvious: the increased cost. A four-year program requires staying in school for at least one more year (two if you are an MBA student), while three-year programs feature higher annual tuition rates due to the summer coursework. However, this is only part of the equation. You also need to account for the lost earnings during that additional year of school. Many people use the wrong calculus here, adding in housing and living expenses (you are going to have to pay for those things whether you are in school or working), but ignoring the wages they fail to garner. A graduating law student going to a BigLaw firm is likely to earn between $140K and $160K as a first year associate - a salary that is lost with an extra year of school. Therefore, the accurate cost of adding an MBA via a fourth year is the tuition, plus the lost year of salary.
The main financial consideration for someone interested in a JD/MBA is to determine whether the long-term cumulative benefits outweigh the known costs of staying in school. And a big takeaway here is that three-year programs are clearly superior to the four-year variety under a purely financial analysis. Of course, there is far more to the equation than simply examining finances and those other considerations will be the subject of future blog topics in this series.
For those interested in learning more about JD/MBA programs, exploring whether the degree might be a good fit, or looking for assistance with a JD/MBA application, please explore our JD/MBA admissions consulting services.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Wharton Round Two Admissions Interview Invitations
Yesterday the Wharton admissions office posted an update on its blog to let applicants know that the school will release all Round 2 interview invitations by tomorrow (Feb. 19).
The admissions committee explains:
The Admissions Committee has already begun releasing interview invitations and will continue to do so daily until 5:00pm EST on Thursday, 19 February 09. Due to the nature and complexity of the admissions process, there is no particular order in which invitations are released. Complete details on how, when, and where to schedule an interview will be provided at the time of invitation. Candidates who are not invited to interview and are no longer being considered for admission will receive a “Deny” decision on 19 February 09.
So, if you still haven't heard from Wharton about your Round 2 application, there's still hope!
For help in preparing for your Wharton interview (or your interview for any other top business school), read our blog entry titled Admissions Interviews - What to Expect. Good luck!
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
HBS Class of 2009 Employment Update
Last week Harvard Business School's Dee Leopold posted an update on HBS second-year students' job prospects for this year. This update is especially interesting to anyone who is preparing to leave a steady job this year to enter a full-time MBA program.
According to Leopold, 77% of the HBS Class of 2009's job seekers (this excludes anyone who will continue academic work or who will return to a previous employer) have found full-time jobs. She went on to write:
I don't have any more details to offer at this point, but we are proud of both our students and our Career Services team who have helped many of our students discover and pursue their dreams and find new opportunities in the midst of great uncertainty in the market. It is still months from graduation and companies and organizations continue to be a big presence on campus - spring will be lively here at HBS. We will provide updates as the season progresses.
Hopefully for those HBS students -- and for students at all business schools this year -- spring will indeed prove to be a lively season for recruiting.
For more information on HBS, visit the Veritas Prep Harvard Business School information page.
Friday, February 13, 2009
GMAT Tip of the Week
Data Sufficiency - Where "No" Means "Affirmative"
(This is one of a series of GMAT tips that we offer on our blog.)
My hat is off to whomever created the Data Sufficiency question type, which holds within its format several delightfully crafty ways to elicit an incorrect answer. Perhaps none is more tricky and understated, however, than the method by which the test preys on our innate connection between the word "no" and its connotation of "negative". (Author's Note: This same connection was exploited recently-and-brilliantly on an episode of 30 Rock, in which Tracy Jordan exclaims that Jack's medical test results were "positive" -- meaning "good news" -- because the actual results came back "negative". But I digress...)
To illustrate, a Data Sufficiency question might ask:
Is x > 0?
A simple enough question, it would seem - is x positive - but then consider a potential first statement:
1) IxI = -x
This statement tells us that the absolute value of the number is equal to itself multiplied by negative one. Because of this, the number cannot be positive - any positive number multiplied by negative one becomes negative, but all absolute values are either positive or zero. A positive number simply cannot satisfy statement 1, and the answer to the overall question -- Is x > 0? -- is "no".
Herein lies the rub -- the answer to the question is "no," which may lead you to believe that statement 1 is "negative" or "undesirable," because of that connotation of the word "no" at which we just arrived. However, "no" is a definitive answer to the overall question. Given the information in statement one, we can prove one answer to that question, which means that "Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient".
If you see, it would be easy, and somewhat intuitive, to "eliminate" statement 1 because it provided the answer "no". But that's not what Data Sufficiency questions ask -- instead, they ask "do you have enough information to answer the question?". Because of that, a definitive answer of "no" is, in fact, enough to answer the question, and so you must remind yourself that "no" means "sufficient". To combat this common pitfall, I suggest writing the word "sufficient" at the top of your noteboard, and glancing at it each time you answer a Data Sufficiency question to remind yourself what the question is specifically asking.
Veritas Prep offers a full lesson on the Data Sufficiency question format, as well as hundreds of Data Sufficiency practice problems in its quantitative curriculum. For more information, please take a look at all of Veritas Prep's GMAT preparation options.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Job Prospects for Business School Graduates Grow Dimmer
Adding to the steady drumbeat of news about the worsening economy in the U.S., this week the Wall Street Journal ran a story about how business schools have seen a record drop-off in recruitment for internships and for full-time jobs.
According to a survey that the Journal conducted in January, 56% of career services offices said that on-campus recruiting was down more than 10% this winter. While that's not necessarily surprising, the trend seems to be accelerating: last fall only 12% estimated that recruiting was down vs. year ago. And activity on the schools' jobs boards is sluggish, with 50% of career offices reporting that activity was down more than 10%, and 20% saying that job-posting activity was down more than 20%.
Compared to surveys conducted in the fall, this report suggests that the economic slowdown caught all but the most pessimistic business school students and career-services officers off their guard. While all schools were bracing for bad news and rough job prospects in the financial sector, the economic downdraft caused by that industry's troubles has affected every sector where MBA grads typically find jobs.
If you're applying to business school now, or are getting ready to apply soon, the obvious question is: What does this mean for you? As we always tell our admissions consulting clients at Veritas Prep, going back to the school (or NOT going back to school) just because of the economy doesn't make sense. And, if you have a good job right now, the thought of leaving it for an uncertain future can be intimidating. However, know that these downturns typically last no more than 2-3 years, meaning that, by the time you would graduate in 2011 or 2012, the odds are pretty good that the job market will once again return to form.
I personally have walked in these shoes. I applied to business school in 2001/2002, right as the coming recession was compounded by the shock of 9/11 to create headlines about worsening job prospects and rescinded job offers for MBAs. By the time I graduated from Kellogg in 2004, the job market was again humming along nicely, and we battle-hardened second-year students regaled jaded first-years with tales about how rough we had it back in the day. Fast-forward three years, and the Kellogg Management Center again had to enforce rules to keep recruiters from not overdoing it on campus.
My point? These things are always cyclical. While this is a particularly rough cycle, especially for someone who will graduate this spring, the job market will bounce back. It always does.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Five Tips for Applying to Law School... Next Year
February is a fascinating month to work with law school admissions consulting clients, because half are scrambling to find their way off the waitlist and decide which program to attend, while the other half are already planning for next year. It is a great reminder that, for some people, the idea of law school isn't a major practical decision staring them in the face, but rather an esoteric concept that seems an eternity away. It also a reminder that many of our clients still control most of the factors that will ultimately impact their law school opportunities.
Therefore, we are focusing on are the five things that people should be doing if they plan to apply to law school next year:
1. Plan around the LSAT. More than any other standardized test, the LSAT is a major influence on your admissions prospects. Part of the reason for this is that the LSAT actually does test a lot of the key critical thinking, reading, and reasoning skills that will have a huge impact on your level of success in the classroom, so law schools put a great deal of emphasis on the resulting test scores. Therefore, ensure that you make the proper investment in your preparation. You may or may not decide to pay for a course (or even just for help with logic games), but you should plan on doing as many practice tests as possible and spending the time necessary to become completely comfortable with the exam. This sounds obvious, but you would be surprised how often people procrastinate in their LSAT preparation ... especially when there is "an entire year" to get it done.
2. Mitigate a weakness. The name of the admissions game is to try to read your own profile (GPA, LSAT, resume, etc.) the way an admissions officer would and then use your personal statement to answer their big questions. In short, you have to write away your weaknesses. In a perfect world, there aren't weaknesses to write away, so you can focus simply on drafting an amazing personal statement. Therefore, one thing you should absolutely do in the next year is identify your biggest weaknesses (this is where consulting or some other form of advising is extremely helpful) and then go out and conquer them. If you have some issues with focus and discipline due to a spotty GPA, take a job that requires great maturity. Even better, take some challenges courses and knock them out of the park. If your motivation as a law school applicant seems questionable, seek out an internship somewhere within the legal space. Rather than merely chasing the "best" job or the most "unique" experience, see if there is something more valuable you can do with your time that will round you out as an applicant.
3. Secure your letters of recommendation. It seems like it would be easy to zip over to the office of your favorite college professors and ask them for a quick turnaround on a great letter of recommendation. It's not. Instead of letting time lapse, go to them now and start the recommendation process. Ask them for their advice on whether you should apply to law school and perhaps which schools. Start outlining a timeline for the process, whereby you will supply them with updates, bullet points about your future application story, and other items that will help them write a great letter.
4. Read. Many people will tell you to avoid studying or anything resembling law school life, since you will be doing so much of it once you get to school. Nonsense! You don't have to read books about Civil Procedure or Tort restatements, but you should always be reading. It will help you with the LSAT and it will certainly help you hit the ground running once you arrive on campus. Don't let your mental muscles atrophy.
5. Visit Campus. A common misconception in the law school universe is that rankings are everything and there is no need to worry about "feel" at the various programs. This is false. That said, it can be difficult to tell schools apart based on their online descriptions. The classes, the clinics, the on campus recruitment, the journals ... it definitely bleeds together. And few programs have a flagship designation like "Law and Econ" (University of Chicago). Therefore, the best way to tease out which schools are the best fit is to go visit them. You will get an idea for where they are located, how people interact, and even the "types" of students that attend. Not only that, but you may have the good fortune of meeting with admissions reps or professors on your visits and making a lasting impression.
In short, make use of the next year in ways that will aid both your candidacy and your level of preparation so that you can make the experience as meaningful as possible. If you are willing to spend countless hours applying, three years and six figures attending, and then a career practicing law, you should be willing to spend the next year preparing for those things.
If not ... well, that's another post entirely!
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
MBA Admissions Webinar with the Toigo Foundation - Feb. 25
On February 25 Veritas Prep and the Robert A. Toigo foundation will host an online seminar for anyone who is considering an MBA and a career in finance.
The Robert A. Toigo Foundation was founded to encourage more minority presence at senior levels across all areas of finance. Consistent with this mission, the Foundation recruits the best, the brightest, and the most committed minority students pursuing finance-related careers.
Minority MBA applicants may apply to become Toigo Fellows who receive tuition assistance, but the grants are really just one part of the Fellowship. The Toigo Foundation provides its members with mentors and coaches to advise, support and guide them. The organization also offers career counseling, continuing education programs, leadership training, and a host of formal and informal networking opportunities for its members.
In the February 25 webinar Veritas Prep will provide an overview of the MBA admissions process. This is an ideal way for a new applicant to get a broad strategic overview of what it takes to get into a top business school. Then, a representative from the Toigo Foundation will provide an introduction to the Foundation's mission, its specific programs, and the benefits it provides to its members.
The webinar is open to anyone who would like to learn more about the MBA admissions process and what the Robert A. Toigo Foundation has to offer. Register now to reserve your spot!
Monday, February 9, 2009
How to Take the GMAT with a Disability
As the world's fastest-growing GMAT prep company, we often receive questions from test takers who want to know how they can take the GMAT with a disability. The Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC), the organization that runs the GMAT, is committed to providing access to the exam to test takers with a variety of disabilities. While it can be hard to find, GMAC has a page on its web site that contains most of what you need to know if you have a disability and are considering taking the GMAT.
That page provides a general overview of how to register for the exam and request specific accomodations if you have a disability. Also, be sure to read this document: Supplement for Test Takers with Disabilities. GMAC will accomodate you if any of these disabilities apply to you:
- Learning Disabilities
- Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
- Physical or Systemic Disabilities
- Psychiatric Disabilities
- Deafness or Hard-of-Hearing Disabilities
- Blindness or Low-Vision Disabilities
If you fall into one of the above camps, GMAC and Pearson VUE (the company that runs the test centers where you will take the GMAT) can make a variety of accommodations. including giving you more time on the exam (up to 100% more time), extended rest breaks during the exam, a reader who can read test questions aloud to you, or enlarged fonts on the computer screen. Overall, GMAC wants the GMAT to measure your true ability, and does not want it to be clouded by a disability that you may have.
If you want to get a feel for the real GMAT exam and see how you will do under timed testing conditions, try Veritas Prep's free practice GMAT exam. Read More >>
Friday, February 6, 2009
GMAT Tip of the Week
To Thine Own Self Be True
(This is one of a series of GMAT tips that we offer on our blog.)
The GMAT tests many things -- grammar, geometry, logic, algebra, etc. as skills; poise under pressure and efficient decision making as virtues; dedication and focus as attributes. Perhaps above all else, the GMAT is a test of thought processes -- you need to know the content in order to apply it to the questions, but simply understanding grammar, logic, and math isn't enough to ensure success. Much of the test hinges on your ability to control the way that you think to ensure that you answer questions specifically and accurately. In business terms, the test wants you to use the assets that you have -- the knowledge of the content -- to accomplish specific tasks -- answer the questions explicitly.
Because of this, the test is full of many pitfalls, which include:
- Answering a tangential question (the questions asks you to solve for the amount of gasoline left in the tank, but you're prone to answering how much was used)
- Assuming something about the variable in question (that it is an integer, or positive, etc.)
- Misreading the intention of a Data Sufficiency question (remember: the question is asking "can you answer this question definitively?" NOT "is the answer yes?" - we'll cover this particular mistake more thoroughly in next week's Tip of the Week)
Naturally, this is an incomplete list of the errors that some may make on the GMAT, as the test is written in a way that will encourage people to unknowingly make mistakes. As such, it is crucial for your preparation to track and find patterns in the mistakes that you often make. If you can simply identify your 2-3 most frequent errors on each side of the exam, and jot those down on your noteboard at the beginning of the test as reminders, you can greatly minimize the number of points you "give back" to the test, but that should rightfully be yours.
As you finalize your GMAT preparation, put an emphasis on minimizing the errors that you make simply because of the way that your mind works under pressure, and you'll increase your score as a result (think of it as "controlling costs" - the more you study, the more you "increase revenue" with you score, but you can "increase profit" by cutting down on those mistakes).
At Veritas Prep, we have worked with thousands of students and, in doing so, identified several of the most common errors that all test-takers are prone to making. The latest addition to the Veritas Prep course materials capitalizes on this experience with a set of sidebar tools, including "How Your Mind Works," to alert you to these pitfalls that you may face, and that you often may not even know exist. Visit our site for more information about the Veritas Prep program and our GMAT prep resources. Read More >>
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Admissions Waitlist Strategies
Yesterday we described the waitlist and how it works. Today, we're focusing on specific waitlist strategies.
Being placed on the waitlist of a top graduate program is a frustrating experience. It feels anticlimactic after such a long process and it can also lead to a period of ambiguity as you wait to see where you will ultimately enroll in the fall. The key to surviving a waitlist process is to create and follow a plan of action, just as you would for your initial application. Putting together a checklist can help you gain valuable insight and perspective into your situation and will allow you to maximize your chances of gaining admission off of the waitlist.
Here is our recommended course of action:
1. Understand the waitlist. For information on understanding how the waitlist works, click here. Being able to determine which schools will use the waitlist heavily allows you to prioritize your approach and lock in on a true top choice.
2. Follow instructions. Often, in their anxiety-fueled attempt to act quickly, waitlisted candidates will rush to respond to a waitlist letter without actually following the school's instructions. Typically, the admissions office will ask for a response showing continued interest and will provide several optional ways to submit materials. However, you should never simply assume that each school's process is exactly the same. Take a deep breath, re-read the letter, go to the website to see what you can find out about the waitlist, and then set everything aside for 24 hours. You will be able to return to the task at hand with some clarity and ensure that you follow all instructions.
3. Reach out. So long as you are following the admission office's instructions, you are always better off being more proactive in this situation. Don't simply check a box and send it in -- get in front of people. Be top of mind. As we explained yesterday, this is the stage where programs want to know your level of interest, first and foremost. So aggressively tell them. You have little to lose at this point, as your waitlist status suggests that you are a qualified candidate still in the running for an unknown number of spots. If you have a contact in the admissions office, email that person right away to let them know you have responded formally and that you will be sending in additional materials. Ask if you can check back in for a status report. You can even be so bold as to ask whether that person thinks the school will be aggressive with the waitlist or not.
4. Review. Once you have followed instructions and put yourself on the school's radar, the next step is to retreat back into your own application. You are going to want to take advantage of optional submission opportunities to both express your interest and also bolster your candidacy. In order to make effective use of this opportunity and keep it from being an "information dump," you should review your application carefully to see what needs to be augmented. This is where a company like Veritas Prep or a trusted advisor can really help -- understanding what you might have left out or what the committee's key question was is an important step in a waitlist game plan. There are two important things to look for when reviewing your application materials:
- That you have achieved balance as a candidate and addressed each of the critical application themes.
- That you have expressed the proper level of fit with the program in question.
5. Augment. Once you have taken inventory of your application and any weaknesses that remain, the next step is to augment that information through any available submission options. The most common is a waitlist response letter or an update letter, which allows you to express your interest and fit, as well as provide any updates that help address weaknesses. You want to avoid simply restating your application materials or delving back into your personal statement. This will be a strong temptation, but must be avoided, simply because you need to be as efficient as possible in a limited amount of space. A good way to ensure that you are using available options effectively is to follow the following "messaging hierarchy":
- Showcase your desire to attend their law school
- Express fit with their law school
- Mitigate the weaknesses that may have kept you from being admitted and that were not properly balanced in your initial application
- Provide updates (especially if they help to mitigate a weakness or offer balance)
- Address general law school-related themes
You will note that tackling law school themes -- normally the first priority in an application -- is the least of your worries when drafting a waitlist letter. You simply don't have space to present a full (and new) picture of your entire candidacy, nor is the school looking for that. They want to know if you will enroll and why. If you can get out in front of your biggest weakness and provide some updates in the process, then that is ideal. Just don't lose sight of the highest-priority messages.
Finally, keep in mind that law schools use a waitlist for a reason: they might need to bring qualified students off of that list and add them to the incoming class. Taking advantage of any opportunity to solidify your story and advertise your qualifications is a way to turn waitlist limbo into a great opportunity. It simply requires stamina to finish the race and total attention to detail.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Understanding the Admissions Waitlist
It is that time of year, when letters start pouring in from graduate school programs: acceptance letters, rejection letters ("dings"), and, yes, waitlist letters.
In tomorrow's post, we will be detailing a process whereby applicants can create a plan of attack for taking full advantage of any waitlist scenarios and leaving as little to chance as humanly possible. First though, we need to explore what the waitlist is and how it works. Understanding the waitlist is critical, because you need to know the rules before you can win the game.
What is a waitlist? The waitlist is a device used by schools to hedge their admissions results. Every program starts the admissions cycle with two critical projected numbers: applications and enrollments. These two "start and finish" numbers inform all of the key pieces of data for that program: acceptance rate, yield rate, financial aid metrics, and so on.
Even when those key numbers become solid (when the enrollment management committee sets an enrollment number and the application pool is finalized), there are still moving parts, because the admissions committee must project what the yield rate (the number of admitted students who ultimately enroll) will look like in order to ascertain how many students to accept. If the yield projection is too low, the school will over-enroll in the fall. On the other hand, if the yield projection is too high, the admissions office will be scrambling to fill the class.
This is where the waitlist comes into play. Obviously, if a program needs to add students at the late stages of the admissions process, they need to have "hot" leads. So when the committee makes decisions on students, they are always sure to keep a number of students in the mix, just in case they need to go and recruit from that pool anew. Therefore, the waitlist is - in its simplest form - a hedge against a bad yield projection.
The waitlist can also be a "soft deny" (a way to let people down easy), a built-in part of the process (winnowing down hundreds of second tier candidates to determine which fifty really want to get in), or even just the fulfillment of the status quo (after all, everyone has a waitlist), but the purest use is as a mechanism for the admissions office to course correct. It's as simple as that.
What is the timing like? Once you know how a waitlist works, the next step is understanding when it will work. At some schools, there may be internal, telltale signs early in the process that they aren't going to hit their enrollment numbers and an aggressive waitlist admissions campaign might begin early. Other programs will think they are golden until the last minute, when the big wave of enrollments never comes. Those are the schools that have to really scramble. Either way, you want to get on the record early and often, expressing your continued interest in the program. If and when the school starts to reach out to waitlisted students, you want to be at the top of the queue.
How can you tell if a school will be going to its waitlist? Sometimes you don't know right way (at least not until waitlisted candidates start chattering on message boards), but there are other times when you can forecast a school going deep into its waitlist. For starters, you can look at recent trends and see how schools have done yielding a class. In particular, look to the previous year and then make an educated guess based on the inverse of that prior year. Schools are very reactionary, so if they yielded tremendously well for the incoming fall 2008 class, you can bet that they were aggressive in building their yield projection for this current cycle. Could be a good waitlist bet. On the contrary, a school that hit the waitlist hard last year is not very likely to admit a lot of students off the waitlist this year, because their reaction is the complete opposite - to get conservative and shrink the projected rate.
Another way you can anticipate a big waitlist push is to figure out which schools are getting leveraged in the financial aid game. What that means is to pay close attention on forums and message boards to get an idea of where the big scholarship awards are coming from ... and which schools are often the "other" choice in the inevitable "where should I go?" scenarios. Several years ago, the money was coming from Penn Law and the most common question was "take money at Penn or go to Chicago without aid?" Several months later, Chicago Law School was going to the waitlist, while Penn had its best class ever. This year, Michigan's law school seems to be flooding the market with cash, putting the screws to NYU, among others. Just looking at the money game, it stands to reason that Michigan will enroll a big class without much waitlist activity, while NYU might have to scramble a bit. So if you got waitlisted at NYU and love the school, get very aggressive about letting them know that. You might just help out both parties immensely.
What is the one thing the school wants to know most about me as a waitlist candidate? Pure and simple, they want to know if you will enroll should they accept you. It sounds a bit crude, but the time for high level matchmaking is largely over - at this stage, the admissions committee simply wants to figure out whether you will be a "one-for-one" conversion. A "one-for-one" refers to the idea that each admitted student off the waitlist will enroll in the program. This is extremely important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the impact it has on the admissions numbers that the school must report at the end of the process. Each additional acceptance letter raises the ever-important acceptance rate and each admitted student that does not enroll further drops the yield rate. Once a program goes to the waitlist (especially if it is unplanned), they are already fully engaged in damage mitigation. Therefore, their primary concern is identifying qualified students (again, this is the value of the waitlist - you can stock a pool of candidates who are all qualified) who will enroll if given the chance.
Many schools will determine this solely by reviewing the materials on file, but others will reach out and try to take the temperature of their waitlisted students. We'll spend some time tomorrow sorting out the best way to communicate your continued interest, but if you express only one thing, make sure it is this: "If you admit me, I will show up."
Tomorrow: How to put together a waitlist plan of attack.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Dartmouth (Tuck) Admissions Decisions Coming on Friday
On Monday Karen Marks, Tuck's Associate of Recruiting and Enrollment, wrote a post on Tuck's blog regarding the school's upcoming decisions for their November round. (Tuck's admissions deadlines aren't called Round 1 and Round 2, etc. Instead, they have an Early Round, a November Round, January Round, and an April Round.) This Friday Tuck's November Round applicants will learn their fates: accepted, denied, or waitlisted.
The substance of Karen's post relates to the questions that Tuck's waitlisted applicants will likely have:
First, let me explain how we decide to waitlist someone. Candidates are placed on the waitlist for a variety of reasons. Sometimes we need more information about an applicant, but see many positive qualities and are interested enough to seek additional data. Sometimes we have questions about English or quantitative proficiency, so we will encourage the candidate to retake their GMAT or Toefl or to complete additional coursework. In other cases there are no particular areas of concern but we are unable to offer admission at that point in our cycle.
Tuck is one of the better schools in terms of openly communicating with waitlisted candidates. If you are waitlisted by Tuck, you will be assigned a single point of contact, and that person will give you feedback on what things you may be able to do to answer any outstanding questions that the admissions committee has. However, if they tell you that there isn't any other information that they need, you should believe them -- they have no incentive not to keep you fully informed of how they view your candidacy.
If there's big news in your life, though, this is always a good reason to reach out to your Tuck point of contact and let them know -- such as if you just got a promotion on your job, took a new job, or have recently achieved something else significant.
In terms of your chances of being admitted off of the waitlist and expected timing, Karen had this to say:
Historically, we have admitted people from the waitlist every year - but the number varies, as does the profile of those admitted off the waitlist. Most of the time we do not admit waitlisted candidates until later in the cycle - usually not until the Spring.
So, be patient, follow the rules, take all the feedback you can get, and good luck!
To get a feel for your chances of being admitted to Tuck and other top MBA programs, try Veritas Prep's Business School Selector.
Monday, February 2, 2009
HBS Round Two Admissions Interviews
Last week the Harvard Business School's Dee Leopold posted a short message on the HBS admissions blog about the timing for Round Two admissions interview invitations:
On February 9 we will send out invitations to interview. The invitation will come in an email from HBS MBA Admissions and will contain detailed instructions about how to sign up for interviews both on campus and in hub cities. Please be assured that if we see you haven't signed up for an interview by the end of the week, we will contact you by phone...thus there's no reason to be anxious about lost emails, etc.
Shortly afterward, I'll update you here as to how many invitations have been issued and how many we expect will go out between February 10 and the April 2 notification date.
Note the second part. While a majority of interview invites will likely go out on Feb. 9, don't despair if you don't hear anything on that day. The admissions office will be working through thousands of applications, and they may not get to yours for another few weeks or more.
Visit Veritas Prep for more information on Harvard Business School and how to ace the MBA admissions interview.