A recent article in the New York Times asked the question, "Are Business Schools Failing?" The piece was prompted by the publicity push around a new book by three Harvard Business School professors, titled Rethinking the M.B.A.: Business Education at a Crossroads. In the book, the professors -- Patrick Cullen, Srikant Datar, and David A. Garvin -- argue that business schools are not turning out leaders, but rather analytics-heavy drones who lack a sense of responsibility to lead their organizations and their greater communities.
The book even goes so far to say that this systemic failure of graduate business programs contributed to the financial meltdown of 2008. While there's a big difference between "contributed to" and "was the primary cause of," we do agree with some of what they have to say.
So, while we don't disagree with any of what the book argues in this area (full disclosure: we've only read reviews of the book, not the book itself), we don't think that this is necessarily anything new. What is more damning in our eyes is what the professors have to say about the students themselves (we quote the NY Times article):
Further diminishing the chances that M.B.A. programs will produce wise stewards of capitalism, students are both strikingly disengaged from classes and overly confident about their capabilities, the authors observe. Introspection is rare; avarice, rampant. Several deans reported to the Harvard researchers that the time students spend in, or preparing for, class has declined significantly -- at one institution, to 30 hours a week in 2003-4 from about 50 in 1975. The authors add: "Rather than devoting themselves to academics, students were spending increasing amounts of time networking, attending recruiting events, planning club activities and pursuing the best possible job." One unnamed dean is quoted as mourning: "The focus has shifted from learning to earning."
If that's true, that's indeed sad, although the author of the NY Times article suggested that this isn't really a new trend. (It's like parents of every generation insisting that their kids are far less respectful than they were 30 years ago.) Whether or not it's a new trend, if students' focus must turn back towards academics, that change will need to come from the top. We'll see if the leadership at each of the world's top MBA programs responds.
If you're thinking about applying to become an avarice-driven MBA student, call the business school admissions experts at Veritas Prep at (800) 925-7737, and we'll gladly give you an initial assessment of your candidacy!
1 comments:
There are four major questions facing MBA programs:
1. Is an MBA’s training necessary to run a major corporation? Obviously no. In 2006 only a paltry 38 percent of Fortune 500 corporations CEO’s have MBA’s. In the retail industry only 26 percent of the 50 largest corporations have MBA’s.
2. Do MBA CEO’s perform better on the job than other CEO’s? Again, the answer is no. As a matter of fact CEO’s with no advanced degree did better with median total return to shareholders, followed by CEO’s with a doctorate and then CEO’s with a master’s degree. MBA CEO’s came in forth, only capable of beating out CEO’s with law degrees.
3. Who does a better job of maintaining the employer-employee compact? Antidotal data suggests that MBA’s do the poorest job of protected their employees and are more prone to terminate employees to increase stock value
4. But what about those CEO’s who commit crimes, lay off employees and get bonuses and compensation increases, or loose millions and get a raise or bonus. Our survey suggests that MBA CEO’s score high in these categories representing between 60 to 70 percent of the scoundrels. This is consistent with the research suggesting that MBA students cheat more than other disciplines of graduate students.
If MBA’s make up only 38 percent of CEO’s but 60 to 70 percent of the greedy CEO’s this implies that business schools are indeed failing.
Think about this. In response to the financial crises and compensation scandals, many deans and educators want to cover over the problems of greed and entitlement associated with a curriculum that teaches MBA to see employees as a commodity and corporate life as a Darwinian struggle. How are they going to solve this problem? By offering oaths.
Post a Comment